Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) WG (pkix)

WEDNESDAY, August 2 at 1400-1600
================================

CHAIRS: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> 
        Tim Polk <tim.polk@nist.gov>


AGENDA:

1. WG Status and Direction

1.1 Document Status Review [Tim Polk (NIST)]

       The working group has a number of Internet-Drafts at various
       stages in the IETF process. (10 min.)

2. PKIX WG Specifications

2.1 3280bis Status
        Tim Polk (NIST)
   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pkix-rfc3280bis-01.txt

      A new draft has been submitted with relatively minor enhancements.
      Several open issues remain to be resolved.  In particular, questions
      involving name ambiguity have been raised, particularly as they
      impact CRL validation.
      (10 min.)

2.2  3280bis Open Issues
       Denis Pinkas
        (no draft)

      This presentation will focus on the open issues currently under
      discussion with respect to 3280bis. (10 min.)

2.3   Simple Certificate Validation Protocol (SCVP)
       Tim Polk (NIST)
         http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pkix-scvp-19.txt

      IPR issues have been resolved since the last IETF meeting, but the
      core specification has not changed significantly since the -18 draft.
      The draft meets the requirements specified in RFC 3379, but consensus
      has not been demonstrated for several issues raised on the list.
      (10 min.)

2.4  SCVP Open Issues
       Denis Pinkas
        (no draft)

      This presentation will focus on the open issues currently under
      discussion with respect to SCVP. (10 min.)

2.5  SRV RR Issues
        Stefan Santesson (Microsoft)
        (no draft)

      A new requirement for an SRV RR othername has been identified.  The
      presenter will explain the requirement and proposed approach for
      satisfying the requirement.
      (10 min.)

3. Related Specifications & Liasion Presentations

      Time allowing, liasion presentations will be accomodated to ensure the
      PKIX WG is aware of related specifications currently progressing as
      individual drafts.

    3.1 CMS Advanced Electronic Signatures (CAdES)
        Denis Pinkas (on behalf of ETSI TC ESI)
          (no draft)

      This document is based on RFC 3126 and is aligned with a re-issue of
      ETSI TS 101 733.
      (10 min.)

    3.2 XKMS
        Stephen Farrell (on behalf of W3C)
          (no draft)

      This presentation will provide an update on the progression of the
      XKMS specifiation within W3C.
      (5 min.)