Privacy-Enhanced Electronic Mail (pem)
--------------------------------------

 Charter
 Last Modified: 02/09/1996

 Current Status: Concluded Working Group

 Chair(s):
     Stephen Kent  <kent@bbn.com>

 Security Area Director(s):
     Jeffrey Schiller  <jis@mit.edu>
     Steve Bellovin  <smb@research.att.com>

 Security Area Advisor:
     Jeffrey Schiller  <jis@mit.edu>

 Mailing Lists: 
     General Discussion:pem-dev@tis.com
     To Subscribe:      pem-dev-request@tis.com
     Archive:           pem-dev-request@tis.com

Description of Working Group:

PEM is the outgrowth of work by the Privacy and Security
Research Group (PSRG) of the IRTF.  At the heart of PEM is a set of
procedures for transforming RFC 822 messages in such a fashion as to
provide integrity, data origin authenticity, and, optionally,
confidentiality.  PEM may be employed with either symmetric or
asymmetric cryptographic key distribution mechanisms.  Because the
asymmetric (public-key) mechanisms are better suited to the large
scale, heterogeneously administered environment characteristic of the
Internet, to date only those mechanisms have been standardized.  The
standard form adopted by PEM is largely a profile of the CCITT X.509
(Directory Authentication Framework) recommendation.

PEM is defined by a series of documents.  The first in the
series defines the message processing procedures.  The second defines
the public-key certification system adopted for use with PEM.
The third provides definitions and identifiers for various
algorithms used by PEM.  The fourth defines message formats and conventions for
user registration, Certificate Revocation List (CRL) distribution,
etc.  (The first three of these were previously issued as RFCs 1113,
1114 and 1115.  All documents have been revised and are being issued
first as Internet-Drafts.)


 Goals and Milestones:

   JUL 91       Revise Proposed Standards and submit to IESG for 
                consideration as a Draft Standard, and repeat for 
                consideration as an Internet Standard. 

   Done         Submit second document as an Internet-Draft. 

   Done         First IETF working group meeting to review Internet-Drafts. 

   Done         Submit revised Internet-Drafts based on comments received 
                during working group meeting, from pem-dev mailing list, 
                etc. 

   Done         Submit Internet-Drafts to IESG for consideration as 
                Proposed Standards. 

   Done         Post an Internet-Draft of the MIME/PEM Interaction 
                specification. 

   APR 93       Submit the PEM/MIME specification to the IESG for 
                consideration as a Proposed Standard. 

   Done         Submit first, third, and fourth documents as 
                Internet-Drafts. 


 Internet-Drafts:

  No Current Internet-Drafts.

 Request For Comments:

  RFC   Stat Published     Title
------- -- ----------- ------------------------------------
RFC1320 I    APR 92    The MD4 Message-Digest Algorithm 

RFC1319 I    APR 92    The MD2 Message-Digest Algorithm 

RFC1321 I    APR 92    The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm 

RFC1424 PS   FEB 93    Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail: 
                       Part IV: Key Certification and Related Services 

RFC1422 PS   FEB 93    Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail: 
                       Part II: Certificate-Based Key Management 

RFC1423 PS   FEB 93    Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail: 
                       Part III: Algorithms, Modes, and Identifiers 

RFC1421 PS   FEB 93    Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail: 
                       Part I: Message Encryption and Authentication 
                       Procedures 

RFC1847 PS   OCT 95    Security Multiparts for MIME: Multipart/Signed and 
                       Multipart/Encrypted 

RFC1848 PS   OCT 95    MIME Object Security Services